Git Credentials Parity

[PROFeNoM]

Description

Reviewer checklist

• Test coverage seems ok.
• Appropriate labels assigned.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.74%. Comparing base (b8bf258) to head (d957985).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3425      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.90%   61.74%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files         141      141              
  Lines       12481    12481              
  Branches     1630     1630              
==========================================
- Hits         7726     7706      -20     
- Misses       4033     4054      +21     
+ Partials      722      721       -1     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b8bf258...d957985. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks [ tracer ]

Benchmark execution time: 2025-09-22 09:03:56

Comparing candidate commit d957985 in PR branch alex/fix/sc-rust-parity with baseline commit b8bf258 in branch master.

Found 4 performance improvements and 5 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 185 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

scenario:MessagePackSerializationBench/benchMessagePackSerialization

• 🟩 execution_time [-3.377µs; -2.423µs] or [-3.069%; -2.202%]

scenario:MessagePackSerializationBench/benchMessagePackSerialization-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-5.340µs; -4.000µs] or [-4.674%; -3.501%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching1

• 🟥 execution_time [+62.411ns; +121.989ns] or [+5.290%; +10.339%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching2

• 🟥 execution_time [+93.136ns; +135.864ns] or [+8.044%; +11.734%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching3

• 🟥 execution_time [+89.436ns; +145.964ns] or [+7.624%; +12.443%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching4

• 🟥 execution_time [+50.122ns; +126.078ns] or [+4.218%; +10.611%]

scenario:TraceAnnotationsBench/benchTraceAnnotationOverhead-opcache

• 🟥 execution_time [+3.440µs; +7.690µs] or [+2.006%; +4.485%]

scenario:TraceFlushBench/benchFlushTrace

• 🟩 execution_time [-65.763µs; -39.537µs] or [-5.106%; -3.070%]

scenario:TraceSerializationBench/benchSerializeTrace

• 🟩 execution_time [-33.838µs; -24.062µs] or [-7.677%; -5.459%]