Refactor

[matbesancon]

Changed name: there was a weird mixup of the object name with the type passed to Ptr

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 89.93% // Head: 89.93% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (244f02c) compared to base (6005530).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #25   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.93%   89.93%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines         328      328           
=======================================
  Hits          295      295           
  Misses         33       33           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/BasicLU.jl	89.93% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[amontoison]

We should probably remove all Ptr{basiclu_object_type} and use Ptr{Cvoid} directly.

[matbesancon]

no strong opinion, in SCIP.jl I found it more readable to mimick the type of the header file

[matbesancon]

Otherwise there are signatures with Ptr{Cvoid} and Ptr{Cint} all over the place

[matbesancon]

done

[amontoison]

Thanks!