Skip to content

Conversation

Tobianas
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Tobianas, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the project's version to 21.4.0-SNAPSHOT across all modules and upgrades several core Opendaylight dependencies, preparing the codebase for the next development iteration. It also includes minor refactoring of nullability annotations and updates to documentation.

Highlights

  • Project Version Update: The main project version and all sub-module versions have been incremented from 21.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 21.4.0-SNAPSHOT.
  • Opendaylight Dependency Upgrades: Key Opendaylight components such as odlparent, mdsal-artifacts, yangtools-artifacts, and others have been updated to their latest patch versions, ensuring compatibility and leveraging recent fixes.
  • Build Tooling Updates: Maven plugins for YANG compilation, code style checking (Checkstyle), and static analysis (SpotBugs) have been upgraded to align with the new Opendaylight parent versions.
  • Nullability Annotation Refactoring: Imports for @nullable annotations in gNMI southbound modules have been migrated from checkerframework to eclipse.jdt.annotation for consistency.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request prepares the project for the next development iteration, 21.4.0-SNAPSHOT. The changes primarily consist of version bumps across numerous pom.xml files, updating the project version and its dependencies. Additionally, some README.md files have been updated to reflect the new version in usage examples. There are also minor formatting changes in some XML files and a consistent use of @Nullable annotations in Java files. My review focuses on some formatting changes in pom.xml files that affect readability. Overall, the changes are consistent with the goal of preparing for a new development version.

<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better readability, it's good practice to have each attribute of an XML tag on a new line, especially when there are multiple attributes. This makes the POM file easier to read and maintain.

Suggested change
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">

@@ -81,8 +79,7 @@
<phase>prepare-package</phase>
<configuration>
<target>
<unzip src="${basedir}/../lighty-rcgnmi-app/target/${lighty.app.zip}"
dest="${basedir}/target/docker-stage" />
<unzip src="${basedir}/../lighty-rcgnmi-app/target/${lighty.app.zip}" dest="${basedir}/target/docker-stage" />

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better readability and maintainability, it's recommended to keep attributes of XML tags on separate lines, especially for long lines like this one. This makes the code easier to read and understand.

                                <unzip src="${basedir}/../lighty-rcgnmi-app/target/${lighty.app.zip}"
                                       dest="${basedir}/target/docker-stage" />

@@ -78,8 +78,7 @@
<phase>prepare-package</phase>
<configuration>
<target>
<unzip src="${basedir}/../lighty-rnc-app/target/${lighty.app.zip}"
dest="${basedir}/target/docker-stage" />
<unzip src="${basedir}/../lighty-rnc-app/target/${lighty.app.zip}" dest="${basedir}/target/docker-stage" />

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better readability and maintainability, it's recommended to keep attributes of XML tags on separate lines, especially for long lines like this one. This makes the code easier to read and understand.

                                <unzip src="${basedir}/../lighty-rnc-app/target/${lighty.app.zip}"
                                       dest="${basedir}/target/docker-stage" />

JIRA: LIGHTY-368
Signed-off-by: tobias.pobocik <[email protected]>
JIRA: LIGHTY-368
Signed-off-by: tobias.pobocik <[email protected]>
JIRA: LIGHTY-368
Signed-off-by: tobias.pobocik <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant