Skip to content

udp ignore error for the issue #246

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

udp ignore error for the issue #246

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 5 additions & 1 deletion src/Network/Socket.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review for src/Network/Socket.cpp:

Code Review: Patch to src/Network/Socket.cpp

Summary

This patch addresses the issue of UDP sockets not handling errors properly. It introduces a conditional check to ignore errors for UDP sockets while emitting errors for TCP sockets.

Detailed Feedback

Code Overview

The patch adds a conditional check within the attachEvent function to handle errors differently for UDP and TCP sockets. It ignores errors for UDP sockets, while emitting errors for TCP sockets using the emitErr function.

Strengths

  • Clear and Concise: The patch is well-written and easy to understand. The conditional check is straightforward and effectively addresses the issue.
  • Targeted Fix: The patch focuses specifically on the UDP error handling issue, without introducing unnecessary changes.

Areas for Improvement

1. Error Handling for UDP

  • Issue: While ignoring errors for UDP sockets might be acceptable in some cases, it's generally not a good practice. UDP is a connectionless protocol, and errors can occur due to various reasons, such as packet loss or network congestion. Ignoring these errors can lead to unexpected behavior and make debugging difficult.
  • Suggestion: Instead of completely ignoring errors, consider logging them with a warning message. This will provide valuable information about potential issues without interrupting the application flow.
  • Example: 
    if (event & EventPoller::Event_Error) {
    if (sock->type() == SockNum::Sock_UDP) {
        // Log the error with a warning message
        WarnL << "UDP socket error: " << getSockErr(sock->rawFd());
    } else {
        strong_self->emitErr(getSockErr(sock->rawFd()));
    }
}

2. Documentation

  • Issue: The patch lacks a clear explanation of the rationale behind ignoring UDP errors.
  • Suggestion: Add a comment explaining why UDP errors are being ignored and the potential implications of this decision. This will help future developers understand the context and make informed decisions about error handling.
  • Example: 
    if (event & EventPoller::Event_Error) {
    if (sock->type() == SockNum::Sock_UDP) {
        // UDP sockets are connectionless and errors are common due to packet loss or network congestion.
        // Ignoring errors here is acceptable for this specific use case, but it's generally not a good practice.
    } else {
        strong_self->emitErr(getSockErr(sock->rawFd()));
    }
}

Conclusion

The patch effectively addresses the UDP error handling issue. However, it's important to consider the implications of ignoring errors for UDP sockets and provide clear documentation for future developers. Logging errors with a warning message would be a more robust approach.

TRANS_BY_GITHUB_AI_ASSISTANT

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -276,7 +276,11 @@ bool Socket::attachEvent(const SockNum::Ptr &sock) {
strong_self->onWriteAble(sock);
}
if (event & EventPoller::Event_Error) {
strong_self->emitErr(getSockErr(sock->rawFd()));
if (sock->type() == SockNum::Sock_UDP) {
// udp ignore error
} else {
strong_self->emitErr(getSockErr(sock->rawFd()));
}
}
});

Expand Down
Loading