Skip to content

Conversation

alex-aipolabs
Copy link
Contributor

@alex-aipolabs alex-aipolabs commented Jun 1, 2025

🏷️ Ticket

[link the issue or ticket you are addressing in this PR here, or use the Development
section on the right sidebar to link the issue]

πŸ“ Description

Specify the filename to upload to wandb

πŸŽ₯ Demo (if applicable)

πŸ“Έ Screenshots (if applicable)

βœ… Checklist

  • I have signed the Contributor License Agreement (CLA) and read the contributing guide (required)
  • I have linked this PR to an issue or a ticket (required)
  • I have updated the documentation related to my change if needed
  • I have updated the tests accordingly (required for a bug fix or a new feature)
  • All checks on CI passed

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added support for specifying custom dataset filenames when loading or saving datasets with Weights & Biases artifacts via the command-line interface.
  • Refactor
    • Improved dataset file handling for more flexible and consistent artifact management, removing reliance on temporary files.
  • Chores
    • Updated command-line options for greater clarity and usability.
    • Enhanced documentation to include details on Weights & Biases logging and updated CLI flags.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 1, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git β†—οΈŽ

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
aci-dev-portal βœ… Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview πŸ’¬ Add feedback Jun 1, 2025 9:02am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a dataset_filename parameter throughout the evaluation pipeline and synthetic intent generator modules. This parameter replaces hardcoded filenames and temporary file usage, allowing explicit specification of dataset filenames when loading, saving, or uploading datasets, particularly in interactions with Weights & Biases (W&B) artifacts. CLI options and method signatures are updated accordingly.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
backend/evals/evaluation_pipeline.py Added dataset_filename parameter to pipeline methods and CLI, replaced hardcoded filenames, updated logging and W&B config, and clarified CLI options.
backend/evals/synthetic_intent_generator.py Added dataset_filename to generator methods, removed temp file logic, and updated artifact saving to use explicit filename.
backend/README.md Updated README to reflect new CLI options --dataset_artifact and --dataset_filename, and added note about W&B logging and dashboard link.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI
    participant EvaluationPipeline
    participant SyntheticIntentGenerator
    participant W&B

    User->>CLI: Run evaluation/generation command with --dataset-filename
    CLI->>EvaluationPipeline: run(dataset_artifact, dataset_filename, ...)
    EvaluationPipeline->>SyntheticIntentGenerator: generate(dataset_artifact, dataset_filename, ...)
    SyntheticIntentGenerator->>W&B: Save dataset as artifact using dataset_filename
    EvaluationPipeline->>W&B: Load dataset using dataset_filename
    EvaluationPipeline->>EvaluationPipeline: Evaluate dataset
    EvaluationPipeline->>W&B: Log results with dataset_filename in config
Loading

Poem

In burrows deep, a filename hops,
No more temp files, those days are dropped!
Now with each artifact, clear and bright,
The dataset’s name is always right.
Hooray for clarity, let’s all cheerβ€”
The pipeline’s path is crystal clear!
πŸ‡πŸ“βœ¨


πŸ“œ Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7cfea84 and 803b42f.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/evals/evaluation_pipeline.py (11 hunks)
  • backend/evals/synthetic_intent_generator.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • backend/evals/synthetic_intent_generator.py
  • backend/evals/evaluation_pipeline.py
✨ Finishing Touches
  • πŸ“ Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
backend/evals/synthetic_intent_generator.py (3)

112-112: Update the docstring to document the new parameter.

The method signature correctly adds the dataset_filename parameter, but the docstring should be updated to describe this parameter.

     def _save_to_wandb(self, df: pd.DataFrame, dataset_artifact: str, dataset_filename: str) -> str:
         """
         Save the dataset as a wandb artifact.
 
         Args:
             df: DataFrame containing the generated dataset
             dataset_artifact: Name for the artifact
+            dataset_filename: Filename to save the dataset CSV to
 
         Returns:
             The artifact name for reference
         """

142-149: Consider adding error handling for file operations.

The direct file writing approach is cleaner than using temporary files, but consider adding error handling for potential issues like directory creation and file write permissions.

         # Write dataframe to the temporary file
+        os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(dataset_filename), exist_ok=True)
         df.to_csv(dataset_filename, index=False)
         # Add the file to the artifact
         artifact.add_file(dataset_filename)
         # Log the artifact
         wandb.log_artifact(artifact)

Note: This would require adding import os back to the imports.


154-154: Update the docstring to document the new parameter.

The method signature correctly adds the dataset_filename parameter, but the docstring should be updated.

     def generate(
         self,
         dataset_artifact: str,
         dataset_filename: str,
         limit: int | None = None,
     ) -> pd.DataFrame:
         """
         Generate synthetic intents and save them.
 
         Args:
+            dataset_artifact: Name for the wandb artifact
+            dataset_filename: Filename to save the dataset CSV to
             limit: Optional limit on number of samples to generate
 
         Returns:
-            The name of the saved artifact
+            DataFrame containing the generated dataset
         """
backend/evals/evaluation_pipeline.py (4)

64-76: Fix the docstring and document the new parameter.

The implementation correctly uses the dataset_filename parameter, but the docstring has issues.

     def _load_dataset_from_wandb(self, artifact_name: str, dataset_filename: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
         """
         Load a dataset from a W&B artifact.
 
         Args:
             artifact_name: Name of the W&B artifact
-            dataset_filename: Filename to save the dataset to
+            dataset_filename: Filename of the dataset CSV within the artifact
         Returns:
             DataFrame containing the dataset
         """

78-98: Update the docstring to document the new parameter.

The method signature and parameter propagation are correct, but the docstring should document the new parameter.

     def _generate(
         self,
         dataset_artifact: str,
         dataset_filename: str,
         generation_limit: int | None = None,
     ) -> pd.DataFrame:
         """
         Generate synthetic intents.
 
         Args:
             dataset_artifact: Name of the artifact to save the dataset to
+            dataset_filename: Filename to save the dataset CSV to
             generation_limit: Optional limit on number of samples to generate
 
         Returns:
             DataFrame containing the generated dataset
         """

104-124: Update the docstring to document the new parameter.

The implementation correctly uses the dataset_filename parameter, but the docstring should document it.

     def _evaluate(
         self,
         dataset_artifact: str,
         dataset_filename: str,
         evaluation_samples: int | None = None,
         df: pd.DataFrame | None = None,
     ) -> dict:
         """
         Evaluate search performance on a dataset.
 
         Args:
             dataset_artifact: Name of the dataset artifact to evaluate
+            dataset_filename: Filename of the dataset CSV within the artifact
             evaluation_samples: Optional limit on number of samples to evaluate
             df: Optional DataFrame containing the dataset. If None, load from dataset_artifact
 
         Returns:
             Dictionary containing evaluation metrics
         """
🧰 Tools
πŸͺ› Pylint (3.3.7)

[warning] 123-123: Use lazy % formatting in logging functions

(W1203)


147-200: Update the docstring to document the new parameter.

The implementation correctly propagates the dataset_filename parameter and includes it in wandb config, but the docstring should document it.

     def run(
         self,
         dataset_artifact: str,
         dataset_filename: str,
         generate_data: bool = False,
         evaluate_data: bool = True,
         generation_limit: int | None = None,
         evaluation_samples: int | None = None,
     ) -> None:
         """
         Run the evaluation pipeline.
 
         Args:
+            dataset_artifact: Name of dataset artifact to use
+            dataset_filename: Filename of the dataset CSV within the artifact
             generate_data: Whether to generate new data
             evaluate_data: Whether to evaluate data
-            dataset_artifact: Name of dataset artifact to use
             generation_limit: Optional limit on number of samples to generate
             evaluation_samples: Optional limit on number of samples to evaluate
 
         Returns:
-            Dictionary containing evaluation metrics if evaluation was performed, None otherwise
+            None
         """
🧰 Tools
πŸͺ› Pylint (3.3.7)

[refactor] 147-147: Too many arguments (7/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 147-147: Too many positional arguments (7/5)

(R0917)

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 62384cb and e436d9e.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/evals/evaluation_pipeline.py (10 hunks)
  • backend/evals/synthetic_intent_generator.py (3 hunks)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (4)
backend/evals/synthetic_intent_generator.py (1)

183-183: LGTM!

The parameter propagation is correct and consistent with the updated method signature.

backend/evals/evaluation_pipeline.py (3)

15-15: LGTM!

Good addition of a sensible default filename constant.


214-225: LGTM!

The CLI option changes are well-designed with clear naming and appropriate defaults. The separation of --dataset-artifact and --dataset-filename provides better clarity.


228-267: LGTM!

The main function signature and pipeline invocation correctly handle the new dataset_filename parameter. All parameters are properly passed through.

🧰 Tools
πŸͺ› Pylint (3.3.7)

[convention] 244-244: Line too long (115/100)

(C0301)

@thisisfixer thisisfixer merged commit 0e19171 into main Jun 2, 2025
6 checks passed
@thisisfixer thisisfixer deleted the fix/specify-filename branch June 2, 2025 15:57
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 7, 2025
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants