Skip to content

Conversation

SWJTU-ZhangLei
Copy link
Contributor

@SWJTU-ZhangLei SWJTU-ZhangLei commented Nov 12, 2024

  • AWS SDK default retry policy check response xml code to determine retry or not, but other object storage such as OSS, COS not compatible with AWS S3, so adding a custome retry policy for solving the problem

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@SWJTU-ZhangLei
Copy link
Contributor Author

pick #43575

@SWJTU-ZhangLei
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

…he#43575)

* AWS SDK default retry policy check response xml `code` to determine
retry or not, but other object storage such as `OSS`, `COS` not
compatible with AWS S3, so adding a custome retry policy for solving the
problem
@SWJTU-ZhangLei
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@dataroaring dataroaring merged commit f97c054 into apache:branch-3.0 Nov 12, 2024
21 of 23 checks passed
@gavinchou gavinchou mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants