dlopen: Progress towards widening components of procedure types #27609
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: David Longnecker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Longnecker <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
NOTE: I will be committing more to this branch after discussing more with BenH about the best approach to take in IWR.
This PR takes an initial stab at widening the
refcomponents (a term for e.g., formals/return-type) of a procedure type. It focuses only on procedure types with therefreturn intent and does not focus on class types orrefformals yet.While here, also adjust how component types are printed when
CHPL_DEVELOPER=1to make it easier to tell which types have been widened. Add some methods toFunctionTypeto make it easier to detectreftypes and construct new function types by substituting components.