[DRAFT] Disable auto-recovery for some WAL write IO error; Re-enable track_and_verify_wals in crash test #13903
+28
−20
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I realized there are more tests that assume auto-recovery ability of WAL write IO error. I need to think more about this and wonder why the previous stress test didn't fail much with the CF inconsistency.
Context/Summary:
When
atomic_flush = false
with multiple column families, when encountering WAL related IO error, individual CF flushing during auto recovery can create data inconsistencies (caught by track_and_verify_wals=1) where some column families advance past the corruption point while others remain behind, preventing successful database restart. Therefore we disable auto recovery by setting a higher severityStatus::Severity::kFatalError
and such testing combination in db crash test.This PR also fixes a bug in stress test that we considered
Status::Severity::kFatalError
as retryable.Test plan: