Kab 1108 Fix storage necessity validation #144
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mariankrotil
commented
Jun 6, 2025
mariankrotil
changed the title
ncapek
reviewed
Jun 6, 2025
… validaiton function
ncapek
reviewed
Jun 9, 2025
radcliffkey
reviewed
Jun 10, 2025
radcliffkey
reviewed
Jun 10, 2025
…ion wrt discussion
davidesner
reviewed
Jun 11, 2025
ncapek
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2025
radcliffkey
reviewed
Jun 11, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We add validation of storage config necessity - During testing, we encountered the bot tried to update transformation without storage configuration, it has to be forbidden.
{}and component type is eitherwriterortransformationSee the error message.
