Skip to content

Conversation

lemillermicrosoft
Copy link
Member

@lemillermicrosoft lemillermicrosoft commented Apr 28, 2023

This commit simplifies the labeler rules for the kernel label by using the any and all operators instead of a list of patterns. This makes the rules more readable and easier to maintain and ensures kernel label is used as appropriate. The logic of the rules still exclude the SemanticKernel and SemanticKernel.Abstractions projects from the kernel label but will now include if only non-core kernel changes are made.

lemillermicrosoft#7
lemillermicrosoft#8
lemillermicrosoft#9

Contribution Checklist

@lemillermicrosoft lemillermicrosoft added the PR: ready for review All feedback addressed, ready for reviews label Apr 28, 2023
      Summary: This commit simplifies the labeler rules for the kernel label by using the any and all operators instead of a list of patterns. This makes the rules more readable and easier to maintain. The logic of the rules remains the same, as they still exclude the SemanticKernel and SemanticKernel.Abstractions projects from the kernel label.
@shawncal shawncal enabled auto-merge (squash) April 28, 2023 01:20
@shawncal shawncal merged commit e456d84 into microsoft:main Apr 28, 2023
lemillermicrosoft added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
### Motivation and Context
#710 tried to enable the `kernel` tag but accidentally applied to too
many changes.

### Description
The best way to resolve this was specify directories under `dotnet` to
be considered for `kernel`.
 
 lemillermicrosoft#7
 lemillermicrosoft#8
 lemillermicrosoft#10
lemillermicrosoft#9 This one was
missed before.
dluc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2023
This commit simplifies the labeler rules for the kernel label by using
the any and all operators instead of a list of patterns. This makes the
rules more readable and easier to maintain and ensures `kernel` label is
used as appropriate. The logic of the rules still exclude the
SemanticKernel and SemanticKernel.Abstractions projects from the kernel
label but will now include if only non-core kernel changes are made.
dluc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2023
### Motivation and Context
#710 tried to enable the `kernel` tag but accidentally applied to too
many changes.

### Description
The best way to resolve this was specify directories under `dotnet` to
be considered for `kernel`.
 
 lemillermicrosoft#7
 lemillermicrosoft#8
 lemillermicrosoft#10
lemillermicrosoft#9 This one was
missed before.
dehoward pushed a commit to lemillermicrosoft/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
This commit simplifies the labeler rules for the kernel label by using
the any and all operators instead of a list of patterns. This makes the
rules more readable and easier to maintain and ensures `kernel` label is
used as appropriate. The logic of the rules still exclude the
SemanticKernel and SemanticKernel.Abstractions projects from the kernel
label but will now include if only non-core kernel changes are made.
dehoward pushed a commit to lemillermicrosoft/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
### Motivation and Context
microsoft#710 tried to enable the `kernel` tag but accidentally applied to too
many changes.

### Description
The best way to resolve this was specify directories under `dotnet` to
be considered for `kernel`.
 
 #7
 #8
 #10
#9 This one was
missed before.
johnoliver pushed a commit to johnoliver/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
This commit simplifies the labeler rules for the kernel label by using
the any and all operators instead of a list of patterns. This makes the
rules more readable and easier to maintain and ensures `kernel` label is
used as appropriate. The logic of the rules still exclude the
SemanticKernel and SemanticKernel.Abstractions projects from the kernel
label but will now include if only non-core kernel changes are made.
johnoliver pushed a commit to johnoliver/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
### Motivation and Context
microsoft#710 tried to enable the `kernel` tag but accidentally applied to too
many changes.

### Description
The best way to resolve this was specify directories under `dotnet` to
be considered for `kernel`.
 
 lemillermicrosoft#7
 lemillermicrosoft#8
 lemillermicrosoft#10
lemillermicrosoft#9 This one was
missed before.
johnoliver pushed a commit to johnoliver/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
This commit simplifies the labeler rules for the kernel label by using
the any and all operators instead of a list of patterns. This makes the
rules more readable and easier to maintain and ensures `kernel` label is
used as appropriate. The logic of the rules still exclude the
SemanticKernel and SemanticKernel.Abstractions projects from the kernel
label but will now include if only non-core kernel changes are made.
johnoliver pushed a commit to johnoliver/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
### Motivation and Context
microsoft#710 tried to enable the `kernel` tag but accidentally applied to too
many changes.

### Description
The best way to resolve this was specify directories under `dotnet` to
be considered for `kernel`.
 
 lemillermicrosoft#7
 lemillermicrosoft#8
 lemillermicrosoft#10
lemillermicrosoft#9 This one was
missed before.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: ready for review All feedback addressed, ready for reviews
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants