doc: fix wording in napi_async_init #49180
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Review requested:
|
nodejs-github-bot
added
doc
legendecas
approved these changes
Aug 15, 2023
| @@ -5633,7 +5633,7 @@ problems like loss of async context when using the `AsyncLocalStorage` API. | |||
|
|
|||
| In order to retain ABI compatibility with previous versions, passing `NULL` | |||
| for `async_resource` does not result in an error. However, this is not | |||
| recommended as this will result poor results with `async_hooks` | |||
| recommended as this will result in undesirable behavior with `async_hooks` | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I found that in #32930, NULL is coerced to a newly created strong-referenced object to avoid breaking async_hooks.executionAsyncResource(). So it is not breaking async_hooks.executionAsyncResource() and AsyncLocalStorage, with the reason mentioned in the paragraph above.
As async_hooks.executionAsyncResource() is guaranteed to return a non-null object, it might be sufficient to state it is undefined behavior if the async_resource is NULL with the semantic conflicts.
lpinca
approved these changes
Aug 17, 2023
lpinca
added
the
commit-queue
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
|
Landed in c4bbf0a |
UlisesGascon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2023
Refs: #32930 PR-URL: #49180 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Merged
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2023
Refs: #32930 PR-URL: #49180 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
sercher
added a commit
to sercher/graaljs
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2024
Refs: nodejs/node#32930 PR-URL: nodejs/node#49180 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
sercher
added a commit
to sercher/graaljs
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2024
Refs: nodejs/node#32930 PR-URL: nodejs/node#49180 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Even after reading through #32930, I am not quite sure what this was supposed to say, so please feel free to suggest alternatives. cc @legendecas @mhdawson