Skip to content

Conversation

albertnetymk
Copy link
Member

@albertnetymk albertnetymk commented Sep 15, 2025

Uniform thread claiming path for different number of workers.

Test: tier1-3


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8367651: Parallel: Remove workers number checking in constructor of PSAdjustTask (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27290/head:pull/27290
$ git checkout pull/27290

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27290
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27290/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27290

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27290

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27290.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 15, 2025

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 15, 2025

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8367651: Parallel: Remove workers number checking in constructor of PSAdjustTask

Reviewed-by: iwalulya, tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 83 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8367651 8367651: Parallel: Remove workers number checking in constructor of PSAdjustTask Sep 15, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 15, 2025

@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 15, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 15, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 19, 2025
@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for review.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 19, 2025

Going to push as commit 5420694.
Since your change was applied there have been 89 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 19, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 19, 2025

@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 5420694.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@albertnetymk albertnetymk deleted the pgc-remove-if branch September 19, 2025 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants