Skip to content

Conversation

asddongmen
Copy link
Collaborator

@asddongmen asddongmen commented Aug 18, 2025

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #1942

What is changed and how it works?

This pull request introduces a priority queue mechanism within the logpuller's subscriptionClient to manage region-related tasks. This enhancement allows the system to prioritize critical tasks, such as handling region errors or changes, over less urgent tasks like new region subscriptions, ensuring more efficient and responsive processing of events from TiKV.

Highlights

Prioritized Region Task Management: Implemented a new thread-safe PriorityQueue to manage region tasks, replacing the previous channel-based approach. This queue prioritizes tasks based on their type (e.g., high priority for region errors, low priority for new subscriptions) and the time they have spent waiting.
Dynamic Task Prioritization: Introduced PriorityTask and regionPriorityTask to define different task types and calculate their priority. Tasks gain higher priority (lower value) as they wait longer in the queue, preventing starvation of lower-priority tasks.

Enhanced subscriptionClient Logic: The subscriptionClient now utilizes this priority queue for scheduling region requests. Error handling paths (e.g., NotLeader, EpochNotMatch, RegionNotFound) now assign TaskErrorPrior to ensure immediate re-scheduling, while new subscriptions are assigned TaskLowPrior.

Comprehensive Unit Testing: New unit tests have been added for both the PriorityQueue and PriorityTask implementations, covering various scenarios including priority ordering, time-based prioritization, blocking/non-blocking operations, and concurrent access.

Codebase Refinement: Cleaned up unused metrics and struct fields within subscription_client.go to improve code clarity and maintainability.

Test Result

Before this PR, creating a changefeed (CF) that generates a large volume of incremental scan tasks would severely impact the resolvedTs lag of other changefeeds. Until the new CF completed incremental scans for all its associated regions, the lag of other CFs would keep rising—even leading to lags of several hours in severe cases.

This PR has greatly mitigated this issue: now, when a new changefeed with a large number of incremental scan tasks is created, it only causes a lag impact of several seconds to a few minutes on other changefeeds. The exact duration of the impact depends on the number of TiKV nodes and regions, as these factors determine how long it takes to complete the incremental scan task for a single region.

After:
image

Before:
image

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

Questions

Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?

Release note

None

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Aug 18, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 18, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @asddongmen, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a priority queue mechanism within the logpuller's subscriptionClient to manage region-related tasks. This enhancement allows the system to prioritize critical tasks, such as handling region errors or changes, over less urgent tasks like new region subscriptions, ensuring more efficient and responsive processing of events from TiKV.

Highlights

  • Prioritized Region Task Management: Implemented a new thread-safe PriorityQueue to manage region tasks, replacing the previous channel-based approach. This queue prioritizes tasks based on their type (e.g., high priority for region errors, low priority for new subscriptions) and the time they have spent waiting.
  • Dynamic Task Prioritization: Introduced PriorityTask and regionPriorityTask to define different task types and calculate their priority. Tasks gain higher priority (lower value) as they wait longer in the queue, preventing starvation of lower-priority tasks.
  • Enhanced subscriptionClient Logic: The subscriptionClient now utilizes this priority queue for scheduling region requests. Error handling paths (e.g., NotLeader, EpochNotMatch, RegionNotFound) now assign TaskHighPrior to ensure immediate re-scheduling, while new subscriptions are assigned TaskLowPrior.
  • Comprehensive Unit Testing: New unit tests have been added for both the PriorityQueue and PriorityTask implementations, covering various scenarios including priority ordering, time-based prioritization, blocking/non-blocking operations, and concurrent access.
  • Codebase Refinement: Cleaned up unused metrics and struct fields within subscription_client.go to improve code clarity and maintainability.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a priority queue for region tasks in the logpuller to better handle tasks like region errors and new subscriptions. The implementation of the priority queue, task prioritization, and its integration into the subscription client are well-structured. I've identified a high-severity bug in the PriorityQueue's Pop method that could lead to a busy-loop, along with a few medium-severity suggestions for improving code clarity, efficiency, and test robustness. Overall, this is a good addition that improves task handling logic.

@asddongmen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test all

Signed-off-by: dongmen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: dongmen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: dongmen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: dongmen <[email protected]>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. labels Sep 4, 2025
Signed-off-by: dongmen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: dongmen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: dongmen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: dongmen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: dongmen <[email protected]>
@asddongmen asddongmen marked this pull request as draft September 5, 2025 05:26
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 5, 2025
@asddongmen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test all

@asddongmen asddongmen self-assigned this Sep 5, 2025
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the lgtm label Sep 5, 2025
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 5, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 3AceShowHand
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign flowbehappy for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 5, 2025

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2025-09-05 10:45:28.430117202 +0000 UTC m=+12594.989998719: ☑️ agreed by 3AceShowHand.

@asddongmen asddongmen marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2025 11:13
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Minimize the impact on the lag of existing changefeeds when creating a new changefeed.
4 participants