Skip to content

Conversation

lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator

@lcwangchao lcwangchao commented Mar 5, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #51366

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 5, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Mar 5, 2024

Hi @lcwangchao. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Mar 5, 2024
@lcwangchao lcwangchao added the compatibility-breaker Violation of forwards/backwards compatibility in a design-time piece. label Mar 5, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Merging #51497 (4c0e4e9) into master (62afab3) will increase coverage by 3.2494%.
Report is 84 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 90.9090%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #51497        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   70.7337%   73.9831%   +3.2494%     
================================================
  Files          1462       1473        +11     
  Lines        435276     450893     +15617     
================================================
+ Hits         307887     333585     +25698     
+ Misses       108095      97446     -10649     
- Partials      19294      19862       +568     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 50.1129% <81.8181%> (?)
unit 71.7408% <72.7272%> (+1.2050%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 53.9957% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 51.1816% <ø> (+5.3490%) ⬆️

@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Mar 5, 2024

@lcwangchao: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Mar 6, 2024

@lcwangchao: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

@songrijie songrijie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Along with the privilege enforcement, we shall include extra dynamic privileges ASAP that allows non-root users share the admin operations. //cc @ljun0712

The given list in this PR looks fine to me.

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Mar 6, 2024

@songrijie: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.

In response to this:

Along with the privilege enforcement, we shall include extra dynamic privileges ASAP that allows non-root users share the admin operations. //cc @ljun0712

The given list in this PR looks fine to me.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Mar 11, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Mar 11, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: qw4990, songrijie, tangenta

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Mar 11, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Mar 11, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-03-11 02:28:30.677461217 +0000 UTC m=+652537.699707605: ☑️ agreed by qw4990.
  • 2024-03-11 02:45:14.5264849 +0000 UTC m=+653541.548731287: ☑️ agreed by tangenta.

@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/hold to add @ljun0712

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 11, 2024
@ljun0712
Copy link

LGTM.
The parts related to SUPER permissions will be adjusted in the future.

@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unhold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 11, 2024
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Mar 11, 2024

@lcwangchao: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Mar 11, 2024

@lcwangchao: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 897d93d into pingcap:master Mar 11, 2024
@lcwangchao lcwangchao deleted the admin_privileges branch March 12, 2024 01:12
lcwangchao added a commit to lcwangchao/tidb that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved compatibility-breaker Violation of forwards/backwards compatibility in a design-time piece. lgtm release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Some admin command can be executed without super privilege
5 participants