Skip to content

Conversation

Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor

@Defined2014 Defined2014 commented Oct 23, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #56804

Problem Summary: If the primary index mentioned is a global index, then it should be a non-clustered index.

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@Defined2014 Defined2014 requested a review from mjonss October 23, 2024 09:34
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 23, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Hi @Defined2014. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.2825%. Comparing base (5cbe855) to head (72f2674).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #56808         +/-   ##
=================================================
- Coverage   73.3016%   57.2825%   -16.0191%     
=================================================
  Files          1636       1786        +150     
  Lines        453237     643171     +189934     
=================================================
+ Hits         332230     368425      +36195     
- Misses       100665     249501     +148836     
- Partials      20342      25245       +4903     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 39.3695% <100.0000%> (?)
unit 72.5045% <14.2857%> (+0.0048%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.9478% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 63.1443% <ø> (+17.1403%) ⬆️

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Oct 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mjonss mjonss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but I would prefer not to implicitly change the [NON]CLUSTERED PK depending on GLOBAL option, rather have the implicit default as is, and fail instead of having GLOBAL change the type implicitly.

Comment on lines 1573 to 1576
// The primary key is also a global index, shouldn't be a clustered index.
if opt != nil && opt.Global {
return false
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So we are changing the implicit default of CLUSTERED PK depending if we have a global index or not?
I would prefer to always have that explicit, and fail if normally it would be CLUSTERED, but GLOBAL is given.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Defined2014 Defined2014 Oct 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated, @mjonss

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mjonss, tangenta

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Oct 25, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 25, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-10-25 06:08:32.605427521 +0000 UTC m=+590513.302218124: ☑️ agreed by tangenta.
  • 2024-10-25 08:39:36.011571533 +0000 UTC m=+599576.708362140: ☑️ agreed by mjonss.

@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Oct 25, 2024

@Defined2014: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit e68be74 into pingcap:master Oct 25, 2024
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

create non partition table with primary key + global index shouldn't success.
3 participants