planner/core: fix a wrong privilege check for CTE & UPDATE statement

[bb7133]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #53490

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

See #53490 (comment), for statement like:

with t_f as (
         select id,pid,name,'AAA' fullname from test.tt1 )
         update test.tt1 inner join t_f
         set tt1.fullname=t_f.fullname
         where tt1.id=t_f.id;

The privilege check for CTE in the update statement should be avoided.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Therocially it consumes more CPU to remove the privilege check, but I believe the real world performance will not be impacted.

Documentation

• NA

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Fix a wrong privilege check when using the `UPDATE` statement with CTE

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.4165%. Comparing base (bd20f66) to head (25798fd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #57430        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.8127%   73.4165%   +0.6038%     
================================================
  Files          1676       1676                
  Lines        463751     463793        +42     
================================================
+ Hits         337670     340501      +2831     
+ Misses       105205     102526      -2679     
+ Partials      20876      20766       -110     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	43.4762% <83.3333%> (?)
unit	72.2244% <83.3333%> (+0.0105%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.7673% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	45.4468% <ø> (+0.0090%)	⬆️

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests
• JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles

[Defined2014]

Please disconnect u53490 and switch to connection default.

[bb7133]

Addressed, PTAL

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Defined2014, hawkingrei

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Defined2014,hawkingrei]
• pkg/planner/OWNERS [hawkingrei]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-11-16 06:43:11.842919092 +0000 UTC m=+684154.033788085: ☑️ agreed by hawkingrei.
• 2024-11-21 04:53:24.855017273 +0000 UTC m=+93792.474671790: ☑️ agreed by Defined2014.

[Defined2014]

/retest

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.5: #57624.