Skip to content

Conversation

Tristan1900
Copy link
Contributor

@Tristan1900 Tristan1900 commented Jan 31, 2025

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #56971

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

reuse memoryusagealarm file in TiDB to generate heap dump for BR
default dump path to /tmp/br_heap_dumps, can be configured by env BR_HEAP_DUMP_DIR
default alarm threshold is 80% of the memory limit
default profiles number to keep is 3

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 31, 2025
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Hi @Tristan1900. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 73.21429% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.9606%. Comparing base (62165a4) to head (8259771).
Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #59234        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.9906%   74.9606%   +1.9699%     
================================================
  Files          1697       1744        +47     
  Lines        468948     477955      +9007     
================================================
+ Hits         342288     358278     +15990     
+ Misses       105575      97247      -8328     
- Partials      21085      22430      +1345     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 49.0855% <68.7500%> (?)
unit 72.3310% <19.6428%> (+0.1449%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.6910% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 61.3815% <77.5000%> (+16.3018%) ⬆️

@Tristan1900
Copy link
Contributor Author

verified in real cluster with an intentional OOM
image
image

Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
@Tristan1900
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tristan1900 commented Feb 24, 2025

verified locally
image
image
image

image

Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
@Tristan1900
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Feb 25, 2025

@Tristan1900: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@YuJuncen YuJuncen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Feb 25, 2025
Copy link
Member

@wjhuang2016 wjhuang2016 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approve for the domain part.

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Feb 25, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wjhuang2016, YuJuncen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Feb 25, 2025
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Feb 25, 2025

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2025-02-25 04:14:16.088401545 +0000 UTC m=+329204.041559803: ☑️ agreed by YuJuncen.
  • 2025-02-25 09:37:52.201960976 +0000 UTC m=+348620.155119239: ☑️ agreed by wjhuang2016.

@Tristan1900
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Feb 25, 2025

@Tristan1900: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@Tristan1900
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Feb 25, 2025

@Tristan1900: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@Tristan1900
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Feb 25, 2025

@Tristan1900: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 15f3c28 into pingcap:master Feb 25, 2025
31 checks passed
zeminzhou pushed a commit to zeminzhou/tidb that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Tristan1900 added a commit to Tristan1900/tidb that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2025
Tristan1900 added a commit to Tristan1900/tidb that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2025
vldmit pushed a commit to vldmit/tidb that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
Co-authored-by: Wenqi Mou <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2f2cd0916b579714db3231031bf1459f2109cb41)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BR: create a heap dump to a persistent storage when BR is about to OOM
3 participants