br: fix pre allocate id exceeds bound

[Leavrth]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #59718

Problem Summary:
BR snapshot restore reuses the last global ID when pre-allocates table IDs

What changed and how does it work?

pre-allocate from last global ID + 1

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[tiprow]

Hi @Leavrth. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.5352%. Comparing base (907eddd) to head (8c15f02).
Report is 44 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #59719        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.9471%   74.5352%   +1.5881%     
================================================
  Files          1697       1713        +16     
  Lines        468911     470125      +1214     
================================================
+ Hits         342057     350409      +8352     
+ Misses       105773      97940      -7833     
- Partials      21081      21776       +695     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	46.3162% <100.0000%> (?)
unit	72.2232% <100.0000%> (+0.0703%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.6910% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	61.4122% <100.0000%> (+16.3325%)	⬆️

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Tristan1900, YuJuncen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• br/OWNERS [YuJuncen]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2025-02-24 12:06:45.408378327 +0000 UTC m=+271153.361536592: ☑️ agreed by YuJuncen.
• 2025-02-24 17:24:45.856662305 +0000 UTC m=+290233.809820570: ☑️ agreed by Tristan1900.

[Tristan1900]

/hold

holding to wait for resolving CI errors

[Leavrth]

/unhold

[Leavrth]

/ok-to-test

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #59780.
But this PR has conflicts, please resolve them!

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.5: #59873.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.1: #59874.
But this PR has conflicts, please resolve them!