-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
types: fix CASE WHEN wrong result when prepare value is NULL #62568
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: yihong0618 <[email protected]>
Hi @yihong0618. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a pingcap member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Hi @yihong0618. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/ok-to-test |
Signed-off-by: yihong0618 <[email protected]>
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #62568 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 72.8667% 73.3763% +0.5095%
================================================
Files 1762 1769 +7
Lines 486020 496757 +10737
================================================
+ Hits 354147 364502 +10355
- Misses 110216 110327 +111
- Partials 21657 21928 +271
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Signed-off-by: yihong0618 <[email protected]>
/check-issue-triage-complete |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rest LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, I test this PR with fuzz tools and don't find the new bug.
/hold waiting for the other's approve |
Signed-off-by: yihong0618 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hawkingrei, YangKeao The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/unhold |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
/unhold |
What problem does this PR solve?
This patch close 62564 by fixing the case when prepare NULL value when case when
prepare, and do not break the json value ref #54145
Issue Number: close #62564
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.