-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 293
codec(ticdc): fix test in debezium protocol #12176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @wk989898, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello! Gemini or gemini-code-assist here, providing a summary of this pull request. Based on the title [DNM]: test rename table in debezium
and the minimal changes, this PR appears to be a work-in-progress or a specific test case setup. The primary intent seems to be adding or verifying the handling of the RENAME TABLE
DDL statement within the Debezium integration tests. The change itself is a single line added to a SQL script used by these tests.
Highlights
- Debezium Integration Test: This PR modifies a SQL script used in the Debezium integration tests.
- RENAME TABLE DDL Test: A specific
RENAME TABLE
statement is added to the test script, likely to test how Debezium handles renaming a table back to its original name or a different schema/name combination.
Changelog
- tests/integration_tests/debezium/sql/ddl.sql
- Added a
RENAME TABLE
statement (RENAME TABLE rename_t8 TO test.t8;
) at line 148 to the DDL test script.
- Added a
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Test DDL runs,
Rename table, check the stream,
Debezium flows.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
/test pull-cdc-integration-kafka-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request, currently marked as "Do Not Merge" (DNM), adds a test case to tests/integration_tests/debezium/sql/ddl.sql
. The change introduces a RENAME TABLE
statement that renames a table to a fully qualified name (e.g., database.table
).
This is a good addition as it enhances test coverage for DDL handling, specifically for RENAME TABLE
operations where the target table name includes the schema/database qualifier. The change is clear, concise, and fits well within the existing test structure.
If this PR were to be prepared for merging (i.e., the DNM prefix removed), please ensure the pull request description, checklist, and release note sections are thoroughly completed as per the template.
Merge Readiness
As this pull request is marked "[DNM]" (Do Not Merge), it is understood to be a work in progress or for testing purposes and is not currently intended for merging.
Should this PR be considered for merging in the future, the following would be required:
- Removal of the "[DNM]" prefix from the title.
- A complete and accurate pull request description, including the problem solved and the changes made.
- Filling out the checklist, including test details.
- Providing an appropriate release note if applicable, or stating
None
.
The code change itself is minor and appears correct for its testing purpose. I am unable to approve pull requests; please ensure further review and approval by authorized maintainers before any merge.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #12176 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 55.0525% 55.0546% +0.0020%
================================================
Files 1030 1030
Lines 143225 143225
================================================
+ Hits 78849 78852 +3
+ Misses 58577 58575 -2
+ Partials 5799 5798 -1 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
/test pull-cdc-integration-kafka-test |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: 3AceShowHand, wlwilliamx The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #11566
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Questions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
Release note