Skip to content

Conversation

paul-dingemans
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Fix incorrect formatting of nested function literal

Closes #2106
Closes #2103

Checklist

Before submitting the PR, please check following (checks which are not relevant may be ignored):

  • Commit message are well written. In addition to a short title, the commit message also explain why a change is made.
  • At least one commit message contains a reference Closes #<xxx> or Fixes #<xxx> (replace<xxx> with issue number)
  • Tests are added
  • KtLint format has been applied on source code itself and violations are fixed
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated
  • PR description added

Documentation is updated. See difference between snapshot and release documentation

@paul-dingemans paul-dingemans added this to the 0.50.1 milestone Jul 3, 2023
@paul-dingemans paul-dingemans merged commit 306325b into master Jul 9, 2023
@paul-dingemans paul-dingemans deleted the 2106-wrap-nested-function-literal branch July 9, 2023 14:55
@paul-dingemans paul-dingemans modified the milestones: 0.50.1, 1.0 (Yeah!) Jul 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Nested function literal should not be forced to be multiline Unexpected indentation level after newline with 0.50.0
1 participant