jackson 2.20.0 #1221
Open
jackson 2.20.0 #1221
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Removed jackson-annotations dependency from the project.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request Checklist
Fixes
Alternative to #1216
jackson-annotations is now on its own versioning scheme and is a transitive dependency anyway.
If sbt supported Maven BOMs, I would suggest adding a dependency on the jackson-bom to manage the version numbering.
The easiest change is to just remove the explicit dependency on jackson-annotations.
Purpose
What does this PR do?
Background Context
Why did you take this approach?
References
Are there any relevant issues / PRs / mailing lists discussions?