Skip to content

Fix eq_op FP on literal of different form #15623

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix eq_op FP on literal of different form #15623

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

profetia
Copy link
Contributor

@profetia profetia commented Sep 6, 2025 •
edited by rustbot
Loading

Closes #15609

changelog: [eq_op] fix FP on literal of different form

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 6, 2025

r? @y21

rustbot has assigned @y21.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Sep 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@y21 y21

Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

eq_op false positive when statically asserting that a numeric value is equal to a byte literal
3 participants
@profetia @rustbot @y21