Skip to content

Conversation

vlsi
Copy link
Collaborator

@vlsi vlsi commented Mar 6, 2025

Summary

Previous Gradle versions required .forUseAtConfigurationTime(), so let's add it.

The PR fixes

FAILURE   0.6sec, dev.sigstore.gradle.SigstorePublishSignTest > sign file(TestedGradleAndSigstoreJava)[1], [1] case=TestedGradleAndSigstoreJava(gradle=TestedGradle(version=Gradle 7.3, configurationCache=ON, projectIsolation=ON), sigstoreJava=LocallyBuiltVersion(version=1.4.0-SNAPSHOT))
    org.gradle.testkit.runner.UnexpectedBuildFailure: Unexpected build execution failure in /tmp/junit-12010571174430091447 with arguments [publishAllPublicationsToTmpRepository, -s]
    Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot obtain value from provider of Gradle property 'dev.sigstore.sign.remove.sigstore.json.asc' at configuration time.
    Use a provider returned by 'forUseAtConfigurationTime()' instead.
    	at org.gradle.api.internal.provider.DefaultValueSourceProviderFactory$NonConfigurationTimeProvider.vetoAtConfigurationTime(DefaultValueSourceProviderFactory.java:198)
    	at org.gradle.api.internal.provider.DefaultValueSourceProviderFactory$ValueSourceProvider.calculateOwnValue(DefaultValueSourceProviderFactory.java:298)
    	at org.gradle.api.internal.provider.AbstractMinimalProvider.getOrNull(AbstractMinimalProvider.java:93)
    	at dev.sigstore.sign.SigstoreSignExtension.sign(SigstoreSignExtension.kt:87)
    	at dev.sigstore.sign.SigstoreSignExtension.sign(SigstoreSignExtension.kt:67)
    	at dev.sigstore.sign.SigstoreSignExtension$sign$1.execute(SigstoreSignExtension.kt:56)
    	at dev.sigstore.sign.SigstoreSignExtension$sign$1.execute(SigstoreSignExtension.kt:55)
    	at org.gradle.configuration.internal.DefaultUserCodeApplicationContext$CurrentApplication$1.execute(DefaultUserCodeApplicationContext.java:123)
 

Release Note

NONE

Documentation

NONE

…ersions

Previous versions required .forUseAtConfigurationTime()

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sitnikov <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@loosebazooka loosebazooka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we have test coverage for this?

@vlsi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

vlsi commented Mar 7, 2025

@vlsi vlsi merged commit 617ea59 into sigstore:main Mar 7, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@vlsi vlsi deleted the prop branch March 7, 2025 17:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants