Skip to content

Conversation

fancywriter
Copy link

Because serverless/serverless#11179 is taking longer to address it's safer to disable this functionality to avoid UX degradation. It's very annoying to see sls deploy function failure, much better to have function code actually deployed, but with warning.

@fancywriter
Copy link
Author

@arabold hey, did you have a chance to review this?

Because serverless/serverless#11179 is taking longer to address it's safer to disable this functionality to avoid UX degradation. It's very annoying to see `sls deploy function` failure, much better to have function code actually deployed, but with warning.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant